A Chimney Sweep Plays Dirty
(“A Case of the Flue,” Forensic Files)
It seems odd that someone with a strong enough work ethic to wriggle down a 20-foot-tall tunnel and clean away soot would later that same day kill a homeowner and steal her cash for an easy payday.
Or maybe it’s because chimney sweep Tim McEnany and his cousin Andrew Reischman had labored so hard for the $300 fee Kathryn Bishop paid them that he decided burglary looked like a better pursuit.
As a YouTube viewer named lonehorseman09 put it so eloquently:
“i owned a chimney sweeping business in western canada for 24 years and this is the type of lowlife you have working for you-fortunately for me nothing physical ever happened to any of my clients.”
Unlike the occasional Forensic Files episode that leaves viewers skeptical about the guilt of the convicted (Jim Barton), “A Case of the Flue” presents a straight trajectory from the incriminating evidence to Tim McEnany.
Bundles of joy. That doesn’t mean McEnany has accepted his fate, however. The inmate has an unusually extensive innocence website. I’ll report on that later. First, here’s a recap of “A Case of the Flue,” along with other information from internet research.
Kathryn I. Bishop, an 82-year-old widow, lived alone in Hummelstown, Pennsylvania, near the state capital of Harrisburg.
She liked to use cash to pay for groceries and had about $6,000 neatly wrapped in circular bundles in a basket on her dining room table. But McEnany was paid by check after he and Reischman cleaned Bishop’s chimney on March 3, 1993.
The next day, Bishop’s daughter, Janet Seitz, stopped by to visit, only to find an ambulance in her mother’s driveway.
Puzzle left behind. Bishop had been beaten to death — kicked more than 60 times by an intruder the night before. Wounds on her arms suggested that the retiree had fought back.
“There was a lot of trauma,” Graham Hetrick, Dauphin County coroner, was quoted as saying in a March 7, 1993 account in the News Record, a North Hills newspaper. “It’s a real pathetic case.”
Police found a word puzzle and a broken pen near the body. They also discovered a receipt from Ace American Chimney Experts, Tim McEnany’s business.
Clean oilman. A neighbor recalled seeing a man running from Bishop’s house the night before, but it was too dark to see his face.
Police started their investigation by questioning an oil company driver who had made a delivery to Bishop’s house on the day of her homicide. He had a solid alibi.
Investigators turned their attentions to the duo from the chimney sweep outfit.
Tim McEnany and Andrew Reischman’s story about their whereabouts the night of Bishop’s death seemed shaky from the outset.
‘Wagers’ of sin. The two claimed they were drinking at Shane’s Flight Deck in Middletown all night, but bartenders recalled that they left and came back at one point.
Cellular One records from McEnany’s massive 1990s-era cell phone showed he made two calls to Bishop’s house that night, both of them unanswered.
Police believed he was checking to make sure she was either asleep or out.
But the burglary turned into a robbery-murder when he (and probably Reischman) discovered Bishop home and wide awake. She was hard of hearing and often didn’t notice the phone ringing, her daughter said.
Loyal cousin. Investigators theorized that McEnany spontaneously decided to kill her, and when Reischman saw the violence, he fled in horror out the side door, in view of the neighbor who reported the sighting.
But apparently, Reischman still returned to the bar with McEnany.
An informant told Patriot-News reporter Peter Shellem that McEnany, then a 26-year-old married father of two, and Reischman, 20, drove to Atlantic City after they left the bar for the night.
McEnany never implicated Reischman, however, and investigators didn’t find strong enough evidence to tie him to the crime. McEnany alone was charged with robbery, second degree murder, and conspiracy.
Investigators had found a paint chip in McEnany’s clothing and discovered it came from the area around Bishop’s basement window, suggesting McEnany entered the house that way.
Little switcheroo. The defense team hired forensic scientist Skip Palenik to refute fiber evidence that investigators said tied McEnany’s black T-shirt to the murder scene.
But Palenik ended up agreeing with the prosecution’s theory — that the fiber evidence pointed to McEnany.
McEnany, who gave a semi-incriminating statement (“Every time I drink I get in trouble”) to the police upon his arrest, maintained his innocence throughout the trial.
On October 20, 1993, after deliberating for five hours, the jury found him guilty of robbery, conspiracy, and second-degree murder.
Chaos and histrionics. When the judge polled each jury member on every charge, McEnany had to hear the word “guilty” 48 times, which sent him over the edge, literally.
He screamed of injustice and tried to escape via a courtroom window.
Adept at scurrying through tight spaces, the 5-foot-8-inch-tall McEnany got halfway out before deputies dragged him back by the ankles, according to an account that appeared in the News-Press of Fort Myers, Florida (yes, the dramatics made news all the way from Pennsylvania to the Sunshine State).
He got life in jail without the possibility of parole.
Supporters persist. McEnany, who is now 51 years old, resides in Pennsylvania’s State Correctional Institution in Somerset along with 2,393 other inmates.
As mentioned, he does maintain a strong presence on the internet and clearly has some people convinced of his innocence. I’ll give his website a good read and also look for an epilogue on Reischman and discuss it in the next post.
Until then, cheers. — RR
Update: Read Part 2
These are definitely not like the fun chimney sweepers from Mary Poppins!
Nothing magical about these two dudes.
Obviously, people who look like criminals should be warehoused in some sort of institution, away from people who are nice looking. It would save everyone a lot of time.
Thanks, RR: I recall the ep, and assigning guilt seemed like a slam-dunk. Why not keep protesting innocence, given the scintilla of hope that it could work, and the distraction from the misery of prison it provides (this isn’t to suggest that the innocent aren’t convicted, just that this case doesn’t appear such)?
PS I can’t recall why Mc’y only got second-degree: the crime involved premeditation, notwithstanding the intention only to rob. And R’n was very lucky indeed to escape Scot-free… I look forward to you next instalment…
Yep, I think it was the intention only to rob that got him second-degree murder. Regardless, when he saw her, he should have just pretended he was back to look for his hat.
RR: If he’s innocent it’s terrible, of course. Although the second-degree charge got him life without parole – the maximum for that charge – in the great majority of states the felony murder under which I think he must have been convicted (non-premeditated murder whilst committing a felony) attracts a first-degree charge, enabling a jury to recommend death. So in this respect he may be fortunate.
I’ll look on his defence site to see if there’s any answer to why he called Ms Bishop twice that evening. Unless he left, or thinks he left, anything there, what reason could there be? I take it this was put to his defence…
To me the circumstantial and forensic evidence is overwhelming.
Happy New Year when we’re there.
Goetz I think you need a reality check. To judge others solely on their appearance and attribute it to a negative charactistic is wrong. Haven’t you ever heard the old saying to not to judge a book by its cover? I’m not justifying my father’s actions if he did in fact commit the crime, it’s just sad that people like you are in this world. Obviously they chose photos that show them in a negative light. As I’m sure his site supporting his innocence depicts photos in a positive light.
Screw you and your sorry father for killing an innocent old lady. May he burn in hell.
I think he should’ve gotten the death penalty.
Pennsylvania has only executed three inmates since ’76 and the most recent execution was carried out in ’99. This makes Pennsylvania one of the least active states involving the death penalty – though Penn is one of the states with the highest number of housed death row inmates. Even if it were ‘active’, I’m unsure this murder would attract it as it doesn’t seem to’ve included the ‘egregious’ elements a jury is usually required to adjudge – being likely a felony murder (where the prime intention was to rob, not to kill).
—
Junior: Goetz’s comment is, of course, ridiculous, and presumably intended as sarcasm or unamusing joke. Whatever, a pointless post. I hope for your sake your father’s innocent and the miscarriage is soon corrected – though it’s very unlikely he is, I’m sorry to say… I don’t support the death penalty and am glad you can have a relationship with him if you wish (for your sake, not his). Why should the innocent loved ones of those who kill also be punished by losing that person to execution? One of the many arguments against the DP…