Making a Sex Criminal
(“Within a Hair,” Forensic Files)
Note: This story was updated with news from September 2020
Richard Alexander’s story on Forensic Files is something of a precursor to Making a Murderer, the Netflix docuseries about Steven Avery.
Avery, an undereducated auto-salvage dealer, spent 18 years in prison because a rape victim mistakenly identified him. DNA evidence exonerated him, but he landed back in prison.
Compact story-telling. Whereas Steven Avery’s saga snagged a 10-hour bingefest on Netflix, Richard Alexander’s got one 30-minute Forensic Files episode.
But “Within a Hair” gets the job done. It’s absorbing and ends on a happier note, with Alexander’s exoneration for rapes he didn’t commit.
Cagey assailant. For this week, I looked around to see whether Richard Alexander won a financial award and whether he rebuilt his life successfully — or ended up behind razor wire again, like Steven Avery.
But first here’s a recap of the Forensic Files episode along with additional information from internet research:
A series of rapes and robberies were taking place in the River Park section of South Bend, Indiana, in 1996.
The attacker took pains to leave the crime scenes free of evidence. He wore gloves and wiped off surfaces. In at least one instance, he covered a victim’s eyes so she couldn’t identify him later.
Bicyclist implicated. In one attack, he came across a young engaged couple who were arguing by the side of the road. He struck the man and raped the woman.
A police dog traced the rapist’s scent from the scene of that crime to some bicycle track marks in the grass. Investigators theorized the attacker got away on a bike.
Not long after, police spotted a young black man riding a mountain bike in the area and took him into custody.
It was Richard Alexander, age 29, and his bad luck was only just beginning.
Lone juror holds out. He denied having anything to do with the River Park rapes and thefts, but three victims picked him or his photograph out of lineups.
A semen sample from one of the rapes in which he was implicated didn’t match Alexander’s DNA. Police dropped charges stemming from that assault, but persisted with other ones.
At his first trial, a racially mixed jury couldn’t reach a decision because one member, a social worker named Barbara Griffin, held out for Alexander’s innocence.
In 1998, after a second trial, an all-white jury convicted him on two of three assaults, and he got 70 years in prison.
Anguish and sadness. Sex criminals tend to get the roughest treatment from other inmates in the prison population, and Alexander’s experience was no different.
In an on-camera interview, Alexander’s pain comes through the TV screen. He witnessed inmates raped in the shower.
Inconvenient truth. Still, as heartbreaking as it is to see someone like him wrongly imprisoned, it’s worth mentioning that, like Avery, Alexander had some rough stuff on his record from the years preceding the rapes.
Alexander’s rap sheet, which Forensic Files showed on camera briefly, included burglary, robbery, receiving stolen property, car theft, and something called “crime deviate cond.”
Steven Avery’s past misdeeds included cruelty to animals.
It’s not outrageous for law enforcement to believe that either of those men could have committed a rape.
Hair does damage. But other parts of the Richard Alexander investigation seemed like a witch hunt. Police deemed it suspicious that his apartment contained “a knife, some hoods, and bandannas.”
Also, the prosecution used a pubic hair found at one of the rape scenes as evidence against Alexander simply because under a microscope, it looked similar to his hair. At the time, there was no mitochondrial DNA testing.
And with Alexander locked away, the rapes continued, this time in the nearby city of Mishawaka, Indiana. One woman identified Alexander as her attacker despite that he was in jail when the assault happened.
Finally, in 2001, Alexander caught a break when police nabbed Michael Murphy fleeing from a residential robbery scene. They found a trove of stolen items in his apartment, including things taken during rapes that were pinned on Alexander.
Yet another attacker. Murphy ended up confessing to rape and 250 thefts. By this time, scientists had developed mitochondrial DNA testing and concluded the pubic hair came from Murphy, not Alexander.
The semen matched DNA from a third man, Mark Williams.
Sergeant Cynthia Eastman noted during her Forensic Files interview that all three of the men looked alike in stature and musculature and were around the same age.
Free at last. They also had completely different facial features, but the crimes happened in the dark and the victims were traumatized.
Murphy got 30 years in jail. Williams, who was already incarcerated for other crimes, received 40 years for one count of rape.
Richard Alexander was liberated on December 12, 2001 after five and a half years behind bars.
He was 35 years old.
“Richard has proclaimed his innocence from day one to anyone who would listen to him. He is extremely happy to be vindicated. He is excited about rebuilding his life,” said deputy public defender Brian Eisenman, as reported in an AP story.
It’s not over. Eastman, who said she always had a feeling Alexander was innocent, described a jubilant hug shared between her and Alexander, and Forensic Files shows joyful scenes of his reunion with family members.
In his final on-camera interview, Alexander said he had received no apology for the wrongful conviction and that “it still hurts because really nothing’s been done since I’ve been out.” The episode ended there.
Sadly, Alexander’s life has improved very little since then, according to information available on the internet.
He found a sympathetic lawyer, Roseann P. Ivanovich, who filed a multimillion lawsuit against the city of South Bend and its police department in 2002.
New woe develops. The suit named Cynthia Eastman as one of the wrongdoers. “Even though she had doubts, she testified against him twice. I have a big problem with that,” Ivanovich said, as reported in a 2002 AP story.
A US district court dismissed Alexander’s lawsuit. A court of appeals upheld the dismissal in 2006.
Things got worse for Alexander.
He pleaded guilty to a count of battery for assaulting a former girlfriend with a lead pipe in 2007. He got six years.
In 2017, the Indiana Department of Corrections listed Richard L. Alexander as having been eligible for parole in 2008 and gave his status as “Returned to court authority on release.”
But things took a tragic turn in September 2020, when police charged Richard with murder and invasion of property after girlfriend Catherine Minix, 37, turned up dead on a residential lawn in South Bend. Although Richard denied committing the fatal stabbing to police, his ex-wife said he admitted to the murder, according to ABC57.
Cause célèbre flattened. As for the rest of the players, it’s unclear whether Michael Murphy — who in addition to the rapes and robberies, had an attempted sexual assault of a 9-year-old girl on his record — is still in jail. The Indiana offender database lists his earliest possible release date as December 15, 2015.
The database gives a 2016 earliest-possible release date for Mark Williams, but doesn’t state whether or not he won parole.
Steven Avery is definitely still in prison and will probably stay there. On November 29, 2017, a Wisconsin judge denied him a new trial.
That’s all for this post. Until next week, cheers. — RR
Watch the Forensic Files episode on YouTube
In a few years everyone on the planet will wear a body cam so to avoid wrongful convictions.
Maybe it could also have a medic alert button.
Wow, November 29, 2017 — that’s pretty up to the minute info on Steven Avery. It’s always tragic when someone spends time in prison for a crime they didn’t commit, but in Avery’s case, maybe there were other crimes he would have committed in those 18 years that he was behind bars that he didn’t have the opportunity to perpetrate. There’s no way to prove it but it helps reconcile the injustice, at least in theory.
Steven Avery did kill his family’s own cat, not a great harbinger…
Most — but not all — agree that it’s better to have the guilty free than the innocent imprisoned. The latter is, of course, a good argument against capital punishment. It’s beyond doubt that there are innocent victims of erroneous — or egregious — prosecution for capital crimes: a very small number, I hope, but how terrible… It’s little consolation that some among them may be guilty of other crimes they got away with, but if that includes murder then I have little problem with karma…
It remains disturbing that the quality of defence in the US is heavily biased to what one can afford: some wealthy guilty go free, and some poor innocent go to prison… or worse…
Interesting…so do all people accused of crimes have access to lawyers of equal caliber in the UK?
You might wanna update this article. He was charged with the murder of his ex in September.
Thanks for writing in — will update! And OMG, how terrible!
Why didn’t Richard Alexander receive any compensation for being falsely in prison ?