Christopher Porco: The Unthinkable

A College Kid Turns Homicidal
“Family Ties” (Forensic Files)

This week, it’s back to Forensic Files, with “Family Ties” (no relation to the 1980s sitcom of the same name).

Christopher Porco

The episode was produced in 2009, toward the end of Forensic Files’ run, and delves into the ax attack on Joan and Peter Porco, a couple from Bethlehem, New York.

The story is something of a middle-class version of the Menendez brothers saga.

Flights of fancy. In the case of the Porcos, there was only one bad son, Christopher, a 21-year-old University of Rochester student. His brother, Jonathan, 23, was on a nuclear submarine at the time of the crime and not implicated.

In the years leading up to the assault on his mother and father, Christopher Porco had told his school friends tall tales about having a wealthy family with extensive real estate holdings and vacation homes. He also committed a number of financial crimes against his parents.

He used ill-gotten loans to pay for a $16,450 yellow Jeep Wrangler and whatever other accoutrements one needs to impersonate a scion of landed gentry.

Photo of the book Forensic Files Now
To order the book:
Amazon

Barnes & Noble
Books-a-Million
Target
Walmart
Indie Bound

And he neglected to tell his parents that the university had suspended him because of poor grades and he had wasted his $30,000 in tuition money. He needed another $30,000 once Rochester let him back in.

A way out. All in all, Christopher was in the hole for at least $50,000 — a lot of debt, but not insurmountable.

Instead of working out a plan to repay his parents, he tried to avoid them, then decided to kill them. He had his eye on their $1 million life insurance payout, authorities believe.

The victims as a young couple: Joan Porco, a school speech pathologist, and her husband, Peter, a lawyer, were married for 30 years

Here’s a recap of the Forensic Files episode plus some additional facts about the Porco case drawn from Crime Library, 48 Hours, and Albany’s Times Union newspaper.

On November 15, 2004, law clerk Peter Porco, 52, didn’t show up for work, so  his colleague Michael Hart stopped by his house on Brockley Drive to check on him.

Peering in the front-door window, Hart saw Peter’s body sprawled on the floor amid a huge amount of blood.

The authorities would later determine Porco had been struck with an ax 16 times.

Apparent burglary. The police found Joan Porco, 54, in the bedroom. Like her husband, she had been hit with an ax, but only three times. The assault had broken her jaw, destroyed one of her eyes, and penetrated her skull deeply enough to expose her brain.

But she was alive and conscious.

Before paramedics took her to the hospital, Detective Christopher Bowdish questioned her about the attacker. In the presence of Bowdish as well as paramedics on the scene, she nodded yes when asked whether it was her younger son.

Police found that someone had smashed the house’s burglar alarm, snipped the phone line, and opened a window and cut a hole in the screen.

The crime scene in Bethlehem, New York

A newspaper reporter first informed Chris Porco about the murder, and he rushed home from Rochester to see his mother in Albany Medical Center, where she had undergone 12 hours of surgery. He told police he was sleeping in the lounge of his dormitory, Munro House, during the time of the attacks.

Mob link. Investigators had a few leads on other suspects. One, an unhappy litigant in a custody case, had vowed revenge against Peter. But the man had a good alibi.

There was also a theory involving organized crime. Perhaps a former loan shark named Frank “Frankie the Fireman” Porco — a great uncle of Peter’s — had been considering ratting out his mob associates, and they killed Peter as a warning not to.

Photo of the book Forensic Files Now
Book available in stores or online

But Frankie was in jail specifically because he refused to cooperate, so that theory evaporated.

Investigators discovered more-compelling evidence against Christopher Porco.

For one, someone had burglarized the Porco’s house in 2002 and 2003, and Christopher was the No. 1 suspect. He used eBay to sell computer equipment stolen from his parents and a veterinary hospital where he worked part time.

Surveillance cameras. Investigators found surveillance video of a yellow Jeep that supported their contention that Christopher traveled 232 miles from Rochester to the Porco’s house the night of the attack, assaulted his mother and father with an ax, and high-tailed it back to Rochester.

Police couldn’t find any New York State Thruway E-ZPass data on the yellow Jeep, but toll booth attendants at the cash-only lanes said they thought they remembered seeing the car with Christopher in the driver’s seat.

Police found Christopher’s E-ZPass on the floor of his Jeep. He removed it to avoid leaving a digital record on the night of the crime, authorities believe

The video evidence came from the university. It had footage of the yellow Jeep leaving and returning to campus at an interval that fit a realistic timeline for commission of the crime:

• 10:30 p.m. Jeep left Rochester campus
• 2:14 a.m. Burglar alarm deactivated at parents’ home
• 4:59 a.m. Phone line cut (this was 2004, when land lines were relevant)
• 8:30 a.m. Jeep returned to campus

Police believe Christopher cut the hole in the window to make it look like a burglary. Nothing was stolen from the house.

Windfall expected. Jonathan Porco, an officer in the U.S. Navy, said that his brother was one of a handful of people who knew the alarm’s four-digit deactivation code. Christopher smashed the alarm box in a failed attempt to mask the fact that someone had punched the correct code in, investigators theorized.

There was more: Christopher had sought financial advice shortly before the ax attack. He told an investment professional he was coming into some money, investigators discovered.

And of course, they found the evidence about those loans that Christopher had taken out fraudulently — using his parents as cosigners without their knowledge.

Investigators also thought Christopher chose an ax as his weapon in the belief it would divert all suspicion to his mob-involved relative “Frankie the Fireman.”

Buddies no help. The trial took place in July of 2006 with Chief Assistant District Attorney Michael P. McDermott leading the prosecution and lawyers Terence Kindlon and Laurie Shanks defending the accused.

The prosecution had no forensic evidence, except for a New York Thruway ticket that allegedly carried Christopher’s mitochondrial DNA. Investigators theorized he wore scrubs from the veterinary office during the assault and then destroyed or hid them.

A colleague testified that Christopher had experience cleaning up after surgical procedures.

Photo of the book Forensic Files Now
Book available in stores or online

Nine of Christopher’s fraternity brothers refuted his story that he was asleep in the lounge at Rochester, and a neighbor driving by the Porco’s house claimed he glimpsed the Jeep in the driveway on the night of the attacks. Still, there were no eyewitnesses placing Christopher directly at the crime scene inside the house.

Here’s the heart-breaking aspect of the trial: Joan Porco stood by her son through everything. She accompanied him to court and testified for the defense.

Mother’s love. She told the jury she didn’t recall implicating Christopher the night of the attack and that her child would never commit a heinous crime like the one that killed her husband and disfigured her.

She maintained that while Christopher’s financial misdeeds angered her and Peter, they all loved one another and wanted to work on their relationship.

In fact, after Christopher’s 2005 indictment for second-degree murder and attempted murder, Joan had scraped together $250,000 for his bail. The two walked to court with their arms linked.

Joan Porco, seen here offering support to Christopher at the trial in 2006, remembered nothing about the attack. She declined to be interviewed for a “48 Hours” report on the case

None of that helped. A jury quickly convicted Christopher on the strength of the timeline the prosecution constructed.

He got 50 years to life and is at the Clinton Correction Facility in Dannemora, New York.

That’s all for this week’s post, but I’d like to continue next Thursday with a look at some of the other interesting parts of the Christopher Porco drama, including the way his doomed father “woke up” after the attack, the conflicting tales about whether Christopher deserved the “Romeo Killer” nickname a made-for-TV movie gave him, and his recent efforts to exit his maximum-security residence.

Until next week, cheers.— RR


Update: Read Part 2 of the Christopher Porco story.

To order the book:
Amazon

Barnes & Noble
Books-a-Million
Target
Walmart
Indie Bound

5 thoughts on “Christopher Porco: The Unthinkable”

  1. With a name like ‘Porco’ it’s hard to believe anything bad could happen. Joan Porco deserves an award for denial. Having a relative named ‘Frankie the Fireman’ suggests general badness is in the genes. The name can infer virility.

  2. I hope his mom remembers and stops supporting her son. I know it’s hard but he does not deserve a mother’s love. He should rot alone. She needs to realize truth is hard at times but ok to forgive but dont be stupid and forget that is part of his problem. Spoilt psychopath.

  3. I don’t think the evidence proved his guilt beyond reasonable doubt at all. I don’t believe his mother is wrong and I understand why she won’t speak to the media. She knows.

    1. On the contrary: although the burden is on the prosecution it had overwhelming circumstantial evidence; the defence very little to rebut it, consisting largely of the lack of physical evidence (as though such evidence is the be-all-and-end-all). I challenge any reasonable person to have found in his favour. As to his admirable mother, it’s emphatically NOT a question of her being right or wrong: when out of coma she said she couldn’t remember the attack (entirely plausible); and who could possibly blame her for either denying his guilt if she DID recall, or giving him benefit of doubt if she’s uncertain? Any mother would find it extremely hard to believe her son could do such a monstrous thing. The ‘take-away’? She’s a wholly unreliable ‘witness’ for literal (injury) and maternal (love/credulousness) reasons such that her belief/opinion should be disregarded.

      Authorities determined that Porco had a history of anti-social behavior that included burglarizing his parents’ home and impersonating his brother and father for the purposes of fraud and loans. The Porco family’s secret code was used to disable the security system at their home on the night of the murder. Relations with his parents were unquestionably (per documentary/epistolary evidence) strained…

      Porco told investigators that on the night of November 14 he retired to a dormitory lounge to sleep and awoke the following morning. Police theory was that he drove more than three hours to Albany in early hours of November 15 to attack his parents. A New York State Thruway toll collector outside Rochester said a yellow Jeep Wrangler (like Porco’s) passed through his station at 10:45 p.m. on November 14, and a collector in Albany recalled the ‘excessive speed’ of a yellow Jeep Wrangler approaching the toll plaza shortly before 2 a.m. on November 15.

      Four security cameras at the Uni of Rochester recorded a yellow Jeep Wrangler leaving the campus at 10:30 p.m. on November 14 and returning at 8:30 a.m. on November 15, this being the period during which the Porcos were attacked. A neighbor of the Porcos testified that he saw Porco’s Jeep in the family’s driveway on the evening of the attack. Also, Uni of Rochester students testified that they did not see Porco sleeping in a dormitory lounge on the night of the attack.

      Now, assuming independent witnesses aren’t mistaken or lying and that no-one outside of a trusted circle had the alarm code, how is this explained? The defence couldn’t. Combined with what was known of Porco’s strained relationship with parents, the thefts, his persistent lying to them, his need of money and scams to get it, it render him VASTLY the most likely culprit… and that’s just what the court found.

      He likely has a screw loose – but not such that he didn’t know how terribly wrong his deed would be and was…

      I’d like to think Joan would come clean (if she DOES recall) if someone else had been – wrongly – in the frame for the crime such that she would’ve been instrumental in the perpetration of wrongful conviction…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *