Mark Hofmann: Forger and Killer

He Defrauded the Mormon Church Religiously
(“Postal Mortem,” Forensic Files)

Mark Hofmann in court

Back in 1985, Mark Hofmann carried out financial crimes that could have landed him in jail for a few month or years.

So he tried to cover them up by committing homicides, which cost him part of his kneecap and all of his freedom.

Hofmann, a dealer in historical documents related to the Mormon faith, decided to get rid of Steve Christensen before he could expose Hofmann as a fraudster selling forgeries.

Diabolical strategy. Then, solely for the purpose of throwing off police, Hofmann murdered a second person. He used the same risky method in both homicides: packages rigged to explode.

The murders and revelations about bogus documents came at a time when the Mormon Church was facing controversy over its new president, an octogenarian named Ezra Taft Benson who had voiced opposition to civil rights and women’s rights.

Although it had nothing to do with Benson, Hofmann, who was born to a Mormon family in Salt Lake City, had become bitter toward the faith and its leaders. His father was reportedly a polygamist, which did not make his mother’s life particularly wonderful.

Photo of the book Forensic Files Now
Book in stores or online

Hofmann, the subject of the Forensic Files episode “Postal Mortem,” was only 30 years old when he committed the homicides — and is still alive. For this week, I checked into where he is and also did more research on his forgeries.

Collector targeted. I also looked into something Forensic Files never brought up: Who was the intended victim of Hofmann’s third, botched bombing attempt?

So let’s get started on a recap of the episode along with other information drawn from internet research:

On October 15, 1985, a package left outside of Steve Christensen’s office in Salt Lake City, Utah, detonated when he picked it up.

It killed Christensen, a 31-year-old father of four who was a bishop in the Mormon Church and collected historical religious documents as a hobby.

The box, wrapped in brown paper, contained a pipe bomb with some pieces imprinted with the Tandy logo (once more, the Radio Shack brand turns up on Forensic Files). It was a motion-sensitive bomb, meaning that slow-moving mercury triggered the detonation.

Salt Lake Temple took 40 years to build. It was finished in 1893
Mark Hofmann’s final bomb exploded in the shadow of Salt Lake Temple

Second victim. Two hours after Christensen’s murder, a 51-year-old woman named Kathy Webb Sheets died after picking up a package wrapped in brown paper that was left in her driveway. The box, addressed to her husband, J. Gary Sheets, contained a pipe bomb with a mercury switch and Tandy parts.

J. Gary Sheets and Steve Christensen were both officers in CFA Financial Services, an investment company that lost millions of dollars of clients’ money. Perhaps a former customer was holding a grudge. After the bombing, CFA employees received police protection.

Then, on Oct. 16, 1985, a third explosion occurred, and it blew the case wide open.

Bomber not a loner. The impact of the bomb sent the victim to LDS Hospital with bruises and burns, damaged eardrums, and a severely wounded knee, but he would survive. His name was Mark Hofmann. He served as a historical researcher for the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.

Hofmann was a happily married father of three small children with another one on the way. He delighted in traveling around the world to collect rare copies of children’s books, but he made a living as a seller of historical documents.

Photo of the book Forensic Files Now
Book in stores or online

He told police he opened the door to his blue sports car, and a bomb that some anonymous evil-doer must have placed inside dropped to the floor and detonated.

But investigators found forensic evidence in the car that contradicted the scenario Hofmann reported. They believed that the bomb went off by accident in his hands — explaining why it blasted off some of his fingertips — as he was placing it on the front seat.

Hot date. Meanwhile, witnesses at the other bombing locations recalled seeing a man in an Olympus High letter jacket carrying a package.

Bombing victims Kathy Sheets and Steve Christensen
Victims Kathy Sheets and Steve Christensen

Police found out that, around the time of Christensen’s death, Hofmann had an appointment with Mormon church officials to discuss a six-figure sale of the McLellin Papers — an account of an early Mormon Church member who broke with founder Joseph Smith. (Hofmann’s McLellin documents were fake, and it’s not clear whether any real such papers existed.)

Investigators theorized that Christensen had figured out Hofmann was selling false antiquarian documents, including the “White Salamander Letter,” which Christensen bought for $40,000 and donated to the church. (Christensen’s intentions may have been to “catch and kill” the story — the document, supposedly written by convert Martin Harris in 1830, cast Joseph Smith in a questionable light.)

Hofmann allegedly wanted to get rid of Christensen before he had a chance to raise doubts about his other wares. The con man had reportedly already made $1.5 million off his forgeries during his career and couldn’t afford to ruin a good thing.

Hot plate. Another theory said that Hofmann committed the murders as a way to divert church officials’ attention long enough for him to pull some forged papers together for a sale.

In Hofmann’s apartment, the police found a printing plate used to make counterfeit documents. He owned a letter jacket like the one the witnesses described.

As for the question of who the intended victim of the third bomb was, police suspected it was someone connected with Hofmann’s forged documents — an innocent individual who knew too much, possibly a collector named Brent Ashworth (more on him in a minute).

Dorie Olds, ex-wife of forger Mark Hofmann
Dorie Olds circa 2010

Menace with a pen. Hofmann ended up pleading guilty to multiple counts of theft by deception and two counts of second-degree murder. He got life in prison.

With Hofmann safely locked away, the church took inventory and compiled a list of 10 Mormonism-related forgeries sold by Hofmann.

Although Hofmann’s animus toward the church allegedly played a role in his crimes, Hofmann didn’t prey upon Mormons alone. He penned convincing signatures of mainstream historical figures including George Washington, Abraham Lincoln, Mark Twain, John Brown, and Button Gwynette, according to the AP.

He followed a 17th-century recipe for ink to create what he hawked as an original copy of the Oath of a Freeman, a Massachusetts Bay Colony document dating back to 1638.

Hofmann reportedly had no trouble making eye contact while telling lies during sales transactions with clients. The esoteric nature of the business also helped.

“Large portions of the trade of antiquarian documents operate in secrecy,” rare-book dealer Jennifer Larson told the Associated Press in a story dated Oct. 26, 1995. “It is the very aspect of the trade that allowed a forger like Hofmann to succeed.”

From sell to cell. Hoffman took precautions at times. Sometimes he would have friends or associates sell the documents in his place.

A fragment of a forged historical document sold by Mark Hofmann
Fragment of a forged document sold by Mark Hofmann

He admitted as much as part of his deal with prosecutors to recount his scams — but he would divulge only the forgeries he’d been formally charged with selling.

After an unsuccessful suicide attempt (sleeping pills) by Hofmann in 1998, prison guards found hidden in his mattress a list of 129 additional fraudulent documents he had possessed at one time.

According to specialist George Throckmorton, who appeared on Forensic Files, all documents known to be sold by Hofmann were fake.

Prose and poetry. The aforementioned Brent Ashworth, a lawyer and collector from Provo, paid $400,000 to $500,000 to buy historical Mormon documents from Hofmann. “I was stupid,” Ashworth told the AP in 1995. “I fell right into it. I was a pawn, but I was one of many.”

Ashworth was correct, and Hofmann’s forgeries continued to float around, even after his incarceration. In 1997, a library in Amherst, Massachusetts, forked over $21,000 for what was presented as a newly discovered poem written in Emily Dickinson’s hand — only to find out it was a fake created by Hofmann, according to a Guardian story that refers to Hofmann as “America’s greatest literary forger.”

Today, Mark Hofmann is better-known as inmate No 41235 in the Central Utah Correctional Facility. At one point after his jailing, his lawyers claimed that Hofmann had bombed his own car intentionally, as a suicide attempt because he was overwhelmed with guilt.

Mark Hofmann as a high school student and in a mug shot
Mark Hofmann, seen in a yearbook photo and a recent mug shot, began scamming at age 14, when he learned to alter old coins

Wife survives. That contention didn’t win Hofmann any leniency. He’s been moved to minimum security, but he has no possibility of parole as his sentence stands today.

His crimes also weighed heavily on his wife, Dorie Olds, although she had no role in them. After her husband’s arrest, reporters and TV cameras dogged her, and some of her fellow churchgoers shunned her, according to an interview she gave to the Salt Lake Tribune.

Olds went on to appear in “An Explosive Love,” a 2010 episode of the ID network’s Who the (Bleep) Did I Marry?

She said that the Mormon community eventually opened its arms to her again and she remains devoted to her faith.

The Mormon Church, too, got a reprieve from bad publicity. Ezra Taft Benson remained president until his death in 1994 and is credited with increasing membership by 2.8 million for a total of 8.7 million followers, according to the Encyclopaedia Britannica.

Update: You can read about the 2021 documentary Murder Among the Mormons and watch it on Netflix.

That’s all for this post. Until next time, cheers. RR


Book cover
Book in stores or online

Watch the Forensic Files episode on YouTube or Tubi or Amazon Prime

16 thoughts on “Mark Hofmann: Forger and Killer”

  1. Thanks, Rebecca. Maybe an interesting dynamic here is the intertwining of a crime that few would be moved by – historic document forgery – and one we all would: murder. For the former could be seen as an intellectual game: beating some of the ‘best’ authenticators – as he did with at least one claimed LDS document – due to one’s forging talent. He was clearly highly skilled (or authenticators incompetent). Some would consider that if you can pull the wool over so-called experts’ eyes, you deserve the spoils…

    But his moral bankruptcy is laid bare in the appalling bombings – ultimately indiscriminate in their potential victims (such as him!), and reminding us of several other FF eps involving bombs, such as:
    https://forensicfilesnow.com/index.php/2018/04/24/chris-marquis-murder-of-a-cb-radio-fraudster/

    I find one of the engaging facets of your site is argument with people who blame the victim/excuse the perp: ‘[victim] had it coming’ (cf https://forensicfilesnow.com/index.php/2018/04/13/bobby-kent-bully-and-victim/)

    Well, no-one in this case would, I think, blame the victims. Hofmann is evil, and, thankfully, will stay locked-up.

    It’s no credit to LDS that his poor wife was initially shunned: a form of victim-blaming again? You know who your friends are in such situations…

  2. All teachers in school hated my guts because I have ugly, illegible hand writing, and I turned out nice. The puke, Hofmann, I notice, has lovely penmanship, even when the pig writes out a receipt. Before every one used computers, enabling equality, people were mean as snakes because they can’t read my notes and receipts. Everyone just loves people with pretty hand writing. And their stupid priceless documents, as if crap people said about anything anywhere by anyone at any time is more important than last week’s tabloids. I wouldn’t wrap fish in their original manuscripts, let alone that forger’s junk. All I’m saying is that people who write pretty are atrocious human beings, and I’m aces. Life is so wrong. I hope Hofmann rots.

    1. Roger: Surely gross generalisations, if not wholly unfounded? I’ve never encountered the notion that people with illegible or poor handwriting are found morally or psychologically wanting by cause/effect. Anecdotally, doctors have poor – probably because rushed – writing: Are they considered disreputable? One swallow – yours – doesn’t make a summer…

      Graphologists maintain that handwriting tells us SOMETHING – but not what you claim.

      I’m not even sure you’re serious!

  3. Amazing that an apparent, talented genius such as Mark Hoffman had to turn to criminal activity. He could probably have become a very successful dealer of legitimate historic books and autographs!

  4. I read on TVTropes that Hoffman may have intentionally blown up his car so that he’d look like another victim. I don’t think that’s true because a narcissist like him wouldn’t intentionally mutilate himself.

    1. More to the point, a car bomb is a most uncertain method of suicide; there are simple, sure ways. The claim his lawyers made is absurd; if there were a bomb it was intended to divert suspicion. Has anyone committed suicide by car bomb (except, perhaps, terrorists?)

  5. “After her husband’s arrest… some of her fellow churchgoers shunned her…” That should have been a clue that she’s misguided in her commitment… She experiences considerable trauma and loss – none of it her own fault – and the one community that should have supported her didn’t. Nice!

    1. Although I agree with you to a degree, I think you have to understand it from the point of view of the community. She was married to this man who sought to destroy and make your community look bad, plus was a murderer. Of all people, she should have been the one with the most suspicions and knowledge of who he was. She stood by him until the very end of the trial when he was finally found guilty by his own admission. Now, I don’t know what “some of her fellow churchgoers shunned her” means to start with. That is a very vague description; not to mention “some” means “a few” and not “all” or even “many.” The point is, I don’t blame them because I was around and followed it during the time. He was a very bad man who rubbed off poorly on everyone he contacted, either questioning their character or their intelligence by taking him seriously.

      1. Insofar as she ‘stood by him’ despite thundering evidence of his guilt, that would annoy ‘the community’ to be sure, but she might respond (as a Mormon) that loyalty to one’s spouse is enjoined by that Church. I wholly disagree that she could or should’ve known of his crimes – that’s absurd (unless there’s evidence she did – is there?)

        Shunning is associated with Mormonism. Insofar as she was – I don’t know, I’m responding to the narrative – I aver that this was plainly morally (and theologically) wrong: she did nothing wrong, rather needing support from just those of her Church who rejected her. Shunning is typically directed at leaving/ex-LDS members. He’ll have been ‘disfellowshipped,’ of course. Did she choose to be or was forced to? I don’t know. These are details.

        Where I think you’re wrong is in expecting/justifying her to be treated per his sins (assuming, as I think we must, she knew nothing), and you make my point yourself: “He was a very bad man who rubbed off poorly on everyone he contacted, either questioning their character or their intelligence by taking him seriously.” HE was – yes…

        Incidentally, something similar happened in another FF case: s7, ep34 – Fire Proof. Paul Keller is a serial arsonist – over 100 fires, three dead, $30m cost – from a committed Christian (Lutheran) family, whose parents were ‘shunned’ (small ‘s’) when he was caught (despite his own father turning him in when he suspected). To treat them thus was an unconscionable disgrace, as if sin by association is doctrine.

        Specifically, the point of view of the Christian community – they allegedly are – should be… Christian, and the treatment of innocent (and hurting) people as if tainted by guilt isn’t Christian – period.

        1. Although I again agree with you on your points, I also believe that human nature is and will always be human nature no matter how “Christian” someone is. The point of Christianity is not to never sin, but to recognize when we do sin and repent (that last point absolutely essential It is hard to tell if those who shunned her have done so. Only God can judge that in the end). It is a process that can take a lifetime.

          I was contrasting an unfair condemnation of her with a condemnation of a whole group. Were they wrong to shun her of all people? Yes. (There is no official practice of shunning in Christianity in general or Mormonism. Those are individual choices). That doesn’t mean we can’t understand why that happened. This was not an incident that could easily be dismissed and forgotten simply by the magical wave of the “that isn’t how Christians respond.” This broke up friendships, trust, beliefs, and even families who had no direct connection. It did a lot of damage that hardly anyone talks about. I do think the action of the Stake President (who was in a position of authority and should have known better) was not excusable. Hopefully he has repented of his lapse of charity. Still, I can totally understand why there were those who didn’t want anything to do with her, right or wrong. She was a victim of him, but so was intersecting communities. I feel sorry for her loneliness. Something should have been done for her sooner. The fact was that those who were hurt by Mark Hoffman had to heal themselves as well. I was an observer of what happened during that time. It created chaos and confusion. She was at the center and by her own admission didn’t speak about her pain, most likely leaving doubt about her from others. Again, putting things in context how she was treated, wrong as it was, understandable.

  6. Hi, Just wanted to point out a small mistake. You wrote that the bombings occurred on October 15 & 16, 1984 multiple times, but I believe they occurred in 1985 as all the other sources i have found say. Thanks and I hope this helps.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *